INFO 4300 / CS4300 Information Retrieval. slides adapted from Hinrich Schütze s, linked from (2025)

(1)

INFO 4300 / CS4300

Information Retrieval

slides adapted from Hinrich Sch¨utze’s,

linked from

http://informationretrieval.org/

IR 17/25: Web Search BasicsPaul Ginsparg

Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

2 Nov 2010

(2)

Administrativa

Assignment 3 due Sun 7 Nov

(3)

Overview

1 Big picture

2 Ads

(4)

Outline

1 Big picture

2 Ads

(5)

Web search overview

(6)

Search is a top activity on the web

(7)

Without search engines, the web wouldn’t work

Without search, content is hard to find.

→ Without search, there is no incentive to create content.Why publish something if nobody will read it?

Why publish something if I don’t get ad revenue from it?Somebody needs to pay for the web.

Servers, web infrastructure, content creationA large part today is paid by search ads.

(8)

Interest aggregation

Unique feature of the web: A small number of geographicallydispersed people with similar interests can find each other.Elementary school kids with hemophilia

People interested in translating R5R5 Scheme into relativelyportable C (open source project)

Search engines are the key enabler for interest aggregation.

(9)

Summary

On the web, search is not just a nice feature.Search is a key enabler of the web: . . .

. . . financing, content creation, interest aggregation etc.

(10)

Outline

1 Big picture

2 Ads

(11)

First generation of search ads: Goto (1996)

(12)

First generation of search ads: Goto (1996)

Buddy Blake bid the maximum ($0.38) for this search.He paid $0.38 to Goto every time somebody clicked on thelink.

Pages are simply ranked according to bid – revenuemaximization for Goto.

No separation of ads/docs. Only one result list!Upfront and honest. No relevance ranking, . . .. . . but Goto did not pretend there was any.

(13)

Second generation of search ads: Google (2000/2001)

Strict separation of search results and search ads

(14)

Two ranked lists: web pages (left) and ads (right)

SogoTrade ap-pears in searchresults.SogoTrade ap-pears in ads.Do search enginesrank advertis-ers higher thannon-advertisers?

All major searchengines claim no.

(15)

Do ads influence editorial content?

Similar problem at newspapers / TV channels

A newspaper is reluctant to publish harsh criticism of itsmajor advertisers.

The line often gets blurred at newspapers / on TV.No known case of this happening with search engines yet?

(16)

How are the ads on the right ranked?

(17)

How are ads ranked?

Advertisers bid for keywords – sale by auction.

Open system: Anybody can participate and bid on keywords.Advertisers areonly charged when somebody clickson your ad.How does the auction determine an ad’s rankand thepricepaidfor the ad?

Basis is a second price auction, but with twists

Squeeze an additional fraction of a cent from each admeansbillions of additional revenue for the search engine.

(18)

How are ads ranked?

First cut: according to bid priceBad idea: open to abuse

Example: query [accident]→adbuy a new carWe don’t want to show nonrelevant ads.Instead: rank based on bid price and relevanceKey measure of ad relevance: clickthrough rateResult: A nonrelevant ad will be ranked low.

Even if this decreases search engine revenue short-termHope: Overall acceptance of the system and overall revenue ismaximized if users get useful information.

Other ranking factors: location, time of day, quality andloading speed of landing page

The main factor of course is the query.

(19)

Google’s second price auction

advertiser bid CTR ad rank rank paid

A $4.00 0.01 0.04 4 (minimum)

B $3.00 0.03 0.09 2 $2.68

C $2.00 0.06 0.12 1 $1.51

D $1.00 0.08 0.08 3 $0.51

bid: maximum bid for a click by advertiser

CTR: click-through rate: when an ad is displayed, whatpercentage of time do users click on it? CTR is a measure ofrelevance.

ad rank: bid×CTR: this trades off (i) how much money theadvertiser is willing to pay against (ii) how relevant the ad isrank: rank in auction

paid: second price auction price paid by advertiserHal Varian explains Google second price auction:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7l0a2PVhPQ

(20)

Google’s second price auction

advertiser bid CTR ad rank rank paid

A $4.00 0.01 0.04 4 (minimum)

B $3.00 0.03 0.09 2 $2.68

C $2.00 0.06 0.12 1 $1.51

D $1.00 0.08 0.08 3 $0.51

Second price auction: The advertiser pays the minimum amountnecessary to maintain their position in the auction (plus 1 cent).price1 × CTR1 = bid2 × CTR2 (this will result in rank1=rank2)

price1 = bid2 ×CTR2 / CTR1

p1 =b2CTR2/CTR1 = 3.00·0.03/0.06 = 1.50

p2 =b3CTR3/CTR2 = 1.00·0.08/0.03 = 2.67

p3 =b4CTR4/CTR3 = 4.00·0.01/0.08 = 0.50

(21)

Keywords with high bids

According to http://www.cwire.org/highest-paying-search-terms/$69.1 mesothelioma treatment options

$65.9 personal injury lawyer michigan$62.6 student loans consolidation$61.4 car accident attorney los angeles$59.4 online car insurance quotes$59.4 arizona dui lawyer

$46.4 asbestos cancer

$40.1 home equity line of credit$39.8 life insurance quotes$39.2 refinancing

$38.7 equity line of credit

$38.0 lasik eye surgery new york city$37.0 2nd mortgage

$35.9 free car insurance quote

(22)

Search ads: A win-win-win?

The search enginecompany gets revenue every timesomebody clicks on an ad.

The useronly clicks on an ad if they are interested in the ad.Search engines punish misleading and nonrelevant ads.As a result, users are often satisfied with what they find afterclicking on an ad.

The advertiserfinds new customers in a cost-effective way.

(23)

Exercise

Why is web search potentially more attractive for advertisersthan TV spots, newspaper ads or radio spots?

The advertiser pays for all this. How can the system berigged? How can the advertiser be cheated?

(24)

Not a win-win-win: Keyword arbitrage

Buy a keyword on Google

Then redirect traffic to a third party that is paying much morethan you are paying Google.

E.g., redirect to a page full of adsThis rarely makes sense for the user.Ad spammers keep inventing new tricks.

The search engines need time to catch up with them.

(25)

Not a win-win-win: Violation of trademarks

Example: geico

During part of 2005: The search term “geico” on Google wasbought by competitors.

Geico lost this case in the United States.

Currently in the courts: Louis Vuitton case in EuropeSeehttp://google.com/tm complaint.html

It’s potentially misleading to users to trigger an ad off of atrademark if the user can’t buy the product on the site.

INFO 4300 / CS4300 Information Retrieval. slides adapted from Hinrich Schütze s, linked from (2025)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Carmelo Roob

Last Updated:

Views: 6300

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Carmelo Roob

Birthday: 1995-01-09

Address: Apt. 915 481 Sipes Cliff, New Gonzalobury, CO 80176

Phone: +6773780339780

Job: Sales Executive

Hobby: Gaming, Jogging, Rugby, Video gaming, Handball, Ice skating, Web surfing

Introduction: My name is Carmelo Roob, I am a modern, handsome, delightful, comfortable, attractive, vast, good person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.